Browse our latest issue here or download the PDF version here.
There’s an election going on at the moment. No—not the Obama/McCain one, and not even the Canadian one that you probably know less about, but affects you more. This one went on with almost no warning and, in the end, will have no positive effect at all.
Perhaps by now you’ve seen a certain campus group’s posters asking you to vote on whether you believe in God. By setting up a booth in CAB, and later SUB, they hope to accomplish what the SU has failed at for far too long—getting students to vote. However, one must immediately question several things regarding this concept.
Firstly, you have to ponder the purpose of performing a poll like this yourself instead of hiring a polling company. You would think that a statistically significant poll would be more valuable—but perhaps empirical evidence is a bit too foreign to some believers.
If you want a hint at their results, see if they line up with a Canada Press poll from this past year that found that 23 per cent of Canadians don’t believe in a God, and 36 per cent of Canadians under 25 were non-believers. In a university campus environment, the latter group is quite prevalent.
Next, with polls like these, one has to wonder how the terms have been defined. It’s unclear what they’re talking about when they mention “God.”
Traditionally, big-G God refers to that guy-in-the-sky that Jews, Muslims, and Christians believe in. But some people believe that there’s some universal spirit or force running through the universe, and they call that god.
Others believe in a deity that started the universe and let it go like a wind-up watch. So what definition are they going with?
Then there’s the strangeness of hinging the metaphysical existence of anything on popularity. Humans often believe pretty crazy things. For example, people have believed the earth was the back of a turtle, while others believed that the Milky Way was fluid squirted from a goddess’s breast. So to run a mock election on belief in God makes me wonder what they hope to prove.
There are a countless number of things that the majority of humanity has previously believed without any empirical evidence that later turned out to be false—the earth being flat, the earth being the centre of the universe, the sun being the centre of the universe, humans being utterly disconnected from the rest of the animal kingdom, the existence of witches, and that masturbation will cause hairy palms.
So to ask whether the majority believes in a supernatural being doesn’t lend anything to its existence—we may as well ask if people believe in the Higgs boson. Without doing actual science, we’ll never know an answer about either.
Some will claim that science can’t know everything, and that God can’t be found in a test tube. Well, he can’t be found in a student group-sponsored poll either. And rather than getting their group more believers, they may inadvertently expose how many unbelievers there are on this campus.
Alberta is often seen as the most conservative Christian province in Canada, and election day will demonstrate why. However, when the 2001 census shows that upwards of 25 per cent of Albertans claim “no religion,” second only to British Columbia, there’s clearly more going on than meets the eye.
So take charge, fellow heathens, heretics, humanists, atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, and skeptics: you are not alone.
Oh, come on. This "vote"
By A.M. GoldOh, come on. This "vote" most likely has nothing to do with the actual outcome of the poll, and everything to do with Campus for Christ member recruitment. After you vote, they give you a survey asking you if you want to explore God with them, i.e. join their group.
I think it's a very clever recruitment scheme, and I wouldn't be surprised if their membership goes up like crazy. Good on them! The UAAA obviously missed the boat by not partnering up with this event and having recruitment tools ready for the people who voted "No."
-A
Please give it a rest
By APlease give it a rest already! We get it.... you're not down with religion. The horse has been dead for some time now. This group is at least getting students engaged in a mature dialogue about religion or at least thinking about spirituality. Plus they're getting students to notice something on campus so props to them.
WILL THE REAL "A" PLEASE STAND UP?
By the real ADear "A",
1 - How dare you steal my infamous nickname!
2 - How dare you write such non-A things under said nickname!
3 - How dare you steal my infamous nickname!
Love,
A aka Alena M aka oH NO YOU DIDN'T
I take issue with the "Give
By C WiseleyI take issue with the "Give it a rest" post above.
C4C has not engaged in discussion with their poll, they have merely asked for opinions on the existence of their deity.
"Mature dialogue", on the other hand, relies on debate and evidence - two things which this poll omits.
Clarification?
By Philip ChowMaybe not "mature dialogue", but I think the writer of "Please give it a rest" is justified in saying that C4C is "getting students...at least thinking about spirituality". If anything, there lots of people talking about the poll; and if they're so inclined, about spirituality and the possible existence of God.
And wouldn't Ian's article (coupled with our responses), not to mention the plethora of unrecorded discussions surfacing on campus regarding this poll and/or the question it asks, only serve to reinforce A's point?
So no matter how you slice it, C4C's event was a complete success.
Boo-yeah.
Post new comment